Friday, January 27, 2017

Ugly Truth: Fox Pedals


I loved watching NAMM coverage this year. Seems like attendance is hardly necessary any more. All the cool new gadgets are getting shown off and I have to do is click some buttons and enjoy other pedal walking around and doing all the work. Also, if I were there, I'd probably have to play the guitar at the booths and I'm sure by the third day, no one will want to hear me play 'Back In Black' any more. Sadly, it seems to be the only song that comes to mind when I'm put on the spot to play something 'cool'.

Story time over, I've personally discovered Fox Pedals while viewing NAMM stuff, and I have to say that they absolutely are stunning. Some of their pedals look like something out of a Eric Carle book and others just have pretty graphics that seem to graphic describe the sounds made with the pedal. So, they are an emerging pedal maker and they look great. Is that, like, it?

Yeah, Kinda

I don't know a lot about the company, I do know that they make a range of pedals, The most impressive one being The Wave. It is a delay that does various washy, trippy, and unique sounds that really don't seem to be easily duplicated by other pedals out there. Their Kingdom pedal is a transparent overdrive that can crank up into almost fuzzy tones when pushed. (how's that for range) They showed off a fuzz, the Defector. The name and tones give me Russian Big Muff vibes, but I'm sure the pedal holds cool features.

Conclusion

Really, this whole post is one big conclusion. These pedals are very interesting. They are boutique and have the advantage of being able to push boundaries in ways that larger companies really can't. It looks like these guys have some great ideas and I'd like to see more from them. Really cool stuff. 



Support the blog by shopping on Amazon by using my link!


There should be an ad below:





Ugly Guitar Truth About Pedal Board Amps

Diffidently not a new thing, but a huge trend this year at NAMM, the pedal board amp has seen a huge rise in popularity among manufactures. Seymour Duncan, among others, have put forth product that are designed to basically take the place of the power section of your amp. Vox has put out a tiny amp head that would be easy enough to mount on a board. Hotone has designed a 20 watt head that is to be paired with their amp model pedals to create a varity of tones. A conglomerit of boutique amp called Boutique Amps, have devised a system of enterchangable preamp circuits to recreate a range of... boutique amps. What does all of this have in common? Not very much, I kind of went off the rails there a little bit. What I want to talk about is that we are seeing tiny little power amps flood the market and what that fact means for the world of guitar players. Shall we?



First Things First



Guitar player hate change, or we love it depending on who you ask. I can't wait to see what pedal or piece of kit come out next. Then I plug my Telecaster directly into a Vox AC15... Loopers, Delays, pretty much everything Strymon does, has facilitated progression in the guitarist spectrum. However, we still love playing amps that were designed in the 1950s with antiquated technology. We can plug a pedal into a Blues Jr. to make it sounds like a space ship taking off and then talk about the richness and warmth that you value from that amp (to make space noises with).




Then Something Happens




Something that the average guitarist has is pedals. Collect a few of those, and you get a pedal board. The most common pedals, or the ones that seem to pile up, are drive pedals. The ones that give you a boost or gain can really help your amp be all that it can be. In fact, so pedals emulate completely different amps. Pedals like the 30 Something, or Golden Plexi practically tell you, "This is a Vox sound," or "This pedal sounds like a Marshall." So if your pedal sounds like an amp, what is your amp doing.


What Are We Doing?


On my board there are several pedal that handle Gain, EQ, Reverb... so I set my amp clean, flat and kill any reverb. If I set my amp to a nice tone (not hard) I will be finding it difficult to find a application other than simple signal processing for my pedals. However, set my amp flat, and I can use my pedals to create a wider range or tones leaning more heavily on the pedals to come up with the distinct sounds. What I'm saying is: you can have a range of great sounds from a particular amp, but they are going to sound like that amp, but a flat (pedal friendly) power section can give you more room to let you pedals shine through.


Conclusion


I meant to talk about amps like the one Seymour Duncan are putting out, but looks like I've just chased my tail for 500 words. Long story... still long actually... pedals are covering a multitude of tasks. Some of those tasks have long been associated with guitar amplifiers. As we are doing more signal processing before the amp, we are asking less of the actual amp. Thus, we are seeing amps that compliment this by having few features and simply push our tone into a speaker. I like this, and at the same time, I don't really like this.



Support the blog by shopping on Amazon by using my link!


There should be an ad below:





Thursday, January 26, 2017

Ugly Guitar Truth: Digitech CabDryVR

Can I start off by saying how much I don't like the name of this pedal. The CabDryVR. No spaces. That's the way it is on the official Digitech site. It drives me crazy. I assumed it was pronounced 'Cab Driver', but really was unsure until I heard the Digitech rep at name say the name. I absolutely hate the way it is spelled. Saying that, I do, kind of, like the pun and color scheme of the pedal. This is one pedal you will not confuse with many others. On to the next bit...


It's A Thing

When I saw this pedal, the first thing I thought is that it is a turd. Just DOA. This pedal won't sell because no one is going to buy a pedal that is basically a blanket for your tone. They don't want a pedal to make their amp sound like it is run through a cab. And then I remembered my experience with the Marshall CODE and how it's cab sim really worked. Then I though about the stage applications of have a 4X12 sound come from a 1X12 Blues Jr...

Conclusion

The very first cab sim I ever encountered was a Digitech RP100. It sounded terrible, but there is hope yet. I've heard a cab sim do rather incredible things, so here's hoping that this little pedal has bottled the magic. Also, let me give a shout out to all those pedal running ampless rigs. Plugging straight into the mix creates some unique challenges and this pedal is probably a god sent to them.





Support the blog by shopping on Amazon by using my link!


There should be an ad below:





Ugly Guitar Truth: DOD Rubberneck Analog Delay



DOD just released the information on their newest analog delay. there is a lot more than meets the eye with pedal. It has 1.5 seconds of delay time, adjustable rate and depth of modulation, bypassable buffer (tails/no tail), quarter/eighth/dotted eighth note subdivides. There is a rubbernecking feature that allows "rubber band" stretched sound, whatever that really means. You can hold the tempo footswitch and engage a regen effect with an adjustable parameter. An actual effects loop will let you insert effects that only affect your trails. Lastly, there is a remote input, so there you go. That all seems fine. Is there any ugly truth. Well...


It's Actually A Strong Offering


So, you look at the features and you can get a little overwhelmed. It seems like you have way more than you could make use of. The features are really all related. For delay users that really capitalize on the analog part of this pedal, the feature list make a lot of sense. You might be tempted to call this a 'shoegazer' pedal. But really, the interface is simple enough to quickly set or tweak. But it is $250. Is that good or bad? Well, take a look at similar pedals: EHX Deluxe Memory Man, Empress Tape Delay.. It's spot on really. It actually packs a lot of features in a pretty package for a reasonable amount of money. Not to mention that it sorta has a feature that is somewhat unique.


Conclusion


I like it. I want to use it and experience the rubbernecking feature for myself. I don't think it would get a spot on my pedalboard though. I really dig these analog delays. They make really cool noises. But digital delay do it well enough. And that might be the ugliest truth. I would put a Boss DD-500 on my board because it could probably do 95% of what this pedal does and then a lot more. Not to mention it is in the small ball park cost wise. I can't tell you that  you should pay 250 dollar for a pedal that does so much less, but if you are in the market for an analog delay that does neat things, this one is a great option.






Support the blog by shopping on Amazon by using my link!


There should be an ad below:





Ugly Guitar Truth: DigiTech FREQOUT


When I first saw this pedal I really didn't know what it was. I saw the large letters that spoke to me somehow. "Freak Out" is the not only the name of the pedal, but also what I did when I realized what this did. It is a Feedback Creator. Strangely, Digitech forgot that BOSS has already made a pedal that did this. Not only that, but they also forgot that no one actually bought that pedal. So why have they chosen to make a new pedal that has already failed? Well, the truth is something we should see about...


It Isn't A BOSS Feedbacker


My knee-jerk reaction was that this pedal was simply a second attempt at an old concept. However, as the booth-guy at NAMM this winter explained, this pedal actually does something that hasn't been done before. This pedal is able to produce natural feedback at any volume. I'm not sure what the BOSS pedal did (if not that) but we will assume it was unnatural for the sake of argument. This pedal has an indicator to tell you how much feedback you have. (also not sure why you need this. your ears should do the same function rather well...) You also have adjustable Range and Type. I'm sure they do something important, but I can't tell you. DigiTech's official website doesn't mention what they do at all either, so I guess we'll have to try one and see...


Conclusion


I like feedback in some applications. I think that this pedal has a lot to offer in the 'make noises that don't sound like guitar' category. I even like the look of it. Digitech is putting out pedals that seem to expand on the sounds that their line of pedal can make. This is actually rather refreshing. Some pedal brands seem to find endless way to make the same drive pedals, but only slightly different. And then continue to make slightly different pedal till the end of time. This seems like a fresh approach and I like what I've seem of this pedal so far. Is it for me? Hard to say. It might be something to keep my eye on though.

Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Ugly Guitar Truth: Gibson S-Series


My relationship with Gibson guitars has always been one of admiration from afar. Back in old days, I would look of catalogs with pictures of pretty arch top electric guitars and just pine away. The prices of the Gibson guitars led me to believe that they were something beyond what I've experienced. As grew as a player, I've since played many Gibson guitars and found them to, be for the most part... a guitar. I even own a Les Paul and a 335. But that name on the headstock has always carried a weight to it, and I attributed that weight mostly to the high cost of admission into the 'club'. I was able to buy my first Fender for $300, but a Gibson (a proper Gibson) would be $1000+. But that looks to change with addition of Gibson's new S-Series guitar. Let's see what we know about them..

There are 5 models.


There is the M2: a flat top dual humbucker look-a-like to the Epiphone Les Paul Special II, The Firebird Zero: which looks to be a firebird's little brother, The SG: an SG, LP Special: very similar to the special but a little curvier, and the LP Studio: This one hasn't changed much, haven't the Les Paul Studios always started around $799? Anyways, They are all stripped down to just one volume and one tone knob. They have wrap around tail pieces, that is except the studio, which has a proper stop tail bridge. They look nice, and you can see the attention to detail in the released photos.


Are They proper Gibson Guitars?


Well, that's actually a tough question. take a look at the head stock and say, 'Yes, you idiot! It's right there!" and to that I'd reply, "Geez, name calling is really unnecessary." But back to the subject, those who likes their Gibsons know what feature are traditionally uses. This is mahogany with a maple cap for the body, and a mahogany neck and rosewood fretboard. However, Gibson went a little off-brand with some models giving them poplar bodies (except for the SG, it's still mahogany) and maple neck. It's clear that they were interested in keeping costs down. And to be honest, these aren't going to really appeal to the Gibson faithful anyways. Those who are looking at these are going to be first time Gibson buyers, maybe upgrading from their Epiphones.


Conclusion


I like the new line. Can't wait till I can get my hands on one and see how it feels. The poplar bodies and maple necks don't really bother me (I'm really a Fender guy so...). All these guitar are made in the USA and have a nitro finish, so it's a quality instrument. The Special reminds me a lot of the PRS Mira for some reason. This kind of blew my mind when I heard that Gibson was going to offer guitar starting at $399. We will see in the near future how these do.



Support the blog by shopping on Amazon by using my link!


There should be an ad below:





Ugly Guitar Truth: EHX Blurst Moddulated Filter

EHX has once again put a new and rather innovative product to market. They call it the Blurst and describe it as a Moddulated Filter. While that sounds like it makes sense, I don't recall anyone really talking about the limitations or features of their prized modulated filter. It seems like a oddity or niche type of effect. I decided to take a closer look at what this pedal does and see if there is any reason to get excited about this pedal.


You Don't Need(?) It

Yeah, this thing makes some weird noises. These noises are not what you typically think of when you imagine guitar noises. But that could be fun, right? Sure. There isn't a lot of information or demonstration out there right now. But, from what we can hear on the EHX demo video, it sounds like a synth filter. However, the interesting part of this filter is that it is time based rather that controlled by your guitar input. You can choose your wave form, tempo, and mix. I feel like there is a lot of versatility with this pedal, but the video only gives us a glimps at what it can do.


Its Strengths Are Its Subtleties

If you watch the demo then you hear a whole lot of 'bwwaaaahhhh' types sounds. To be honest, I don't see much use for these noises. I understand that there are types of players that can make some great sounds with filters, but typically don't use them or just use them in a very limited capacity. However, at the end of EHX's demo, they stick the Blurst in the effects loop of a Deluxe Memory Man and it's actually pretty epic. Plus, I have to give honorable mention to the sounds in the video made with help of EHX's 8-Step Program (stepping expression controller) which give you a step filter/seek wah/FM4 type sound. These two pedal can create lots of combinations, but seems like a lot hardware to create an effect done by a single pedal (just my 2 cents).


Conclusion

Look, I want to like this pedal. It looks... interesting. It has lots of knobs and buttons. It makes weird sounds, but maybe I'm just thinking to much like a guitar player. I want to be able to riff and jam, and this things seems like a noise maker. So let me completely contradict myself. The couple of sounds that I did like, were actually pretty cool. Plus the one thing that make this pedal different is what really makes this pedal. The tap feature allows you to sync up with the tempo of the music being played. I'm not the biggest fan of filters, but I'm not aware of many that let you do this. Can you make to sounds in the demo with other pedals? probably, but is a rather versatile pedal with expressive features.



Support the blog by shopping on Amazon by using my link!


There should be an ad below:





Thursday, January 12, 2017

Ugly Guitar Truth: BBE Mini Sonic Stomp

So, I've a complicated relationship with BBE's pedals. I had the Acousi Max... and I really liked it. That is until its power jack tore the trace off of the pcb and I had to perform surgery on to keep it working. However I was never really able to trust it after that, so I leaned more on my Aphex Acoustic Xciter pedal (great pedal btw). I've never really bothered with the regular Sonic Stomp/ Sonic Maximizer. Why? I've been able to recreate most of the effect with a decent EQ pedal. So, when I saw that BBE had made a mini version of the pedal, I got excited. I thought that maybe it is time to pick one of these up. I could save some space on my board and have a simple "tweak the highs and lowest" kind of pedal. And then I found some things that weren't so pretty.


Concentric Knobs


The first time I saw concentric knobs it was on the BOSS MT-2 Metal Zone. I thought it was a great way to offer more controls in a tight space. Super cool idea. But what I don't understand is what they decided to do it on this particular pedal. It has two controls. Even though it is in a tiny package, it still has room for two separate knobs. So, why make it more difficult to manipulate than it has to be. Doesn't make a lot of sense to me.


Pricing


Yes, I know, I'm cheap. $99 is fine for a great pedal. The Sonic Stomp is cool pedal. It's Super useable, simple and straightforward. But the regular version is actually cheaper. Right now the regular Sonic Stomp is under $65. Used you can find them for $40. So why are you going to pay nearly double for a mini version. Obviously BBE have their reasons for their pricing, but in the case of Ibanez, their mini pedals are priced under their full sized units. EHX also cuts price along with size in most of their pedals. So why BBE do you have to up charge are down sizing.


Conclusion


That's all I really have to say about this pedal. It is really simple, and probably just as good as its bigger brother. Maybe it is a full update to the hardware. They could have called it a MKII if that's true. To be honest, I would have minded if they stuck it in a 1590b sized box and kept the price were it is.



Support the blog by shopping on Amazon by using my link!


There should be an ad below:





Monday, January 9, 2017

Ugly Guitar Truth: Marsall Code vs Boss Katana

Recently I was able to check out two of the most promising budget/modeling combo amps released in 2016. The BOSS Katana (100 watt combo) and the Marshall CODE (50 watt combo). Both of these amps have been backordered and hard to come by via the online stores practically ever since their respective releases. (The Marshall CODE, as of this writing, is still backordered) So when I was able to sit down and meet these amps in person, I was very excited. I had been cautiously excited about these two from the moment I saw there specs. I was eager to find out if they would exceed my expectations, or succumb to the fate of most other modeling combos. Let's find out.






The Marshall CODE





I was very surprised by the size of it. It was so tiny. I had to reassure myself that I was actually playing the 50 version and not the 25 watt 1x10. I was, and boy could I tell. It was loud! I had a fear that it would sound boxy, it didn't. The small frame is very misleading in the best way possible. The next thing I noticed was the controls. I should say, the lock there of. I've seen plenty of pictures and I knew the specs, but nothing really prepared me for the simplicity of the layout. I recalled using a Marshall AVT 150 head with it's 24 knobs. I absolutely loved this about the CODE. It is very easy to tweak all the things that matter and there isn't any messing around with menus unless you absolutely have to. Although, if you do want to fiddle with presets, you (kind of) have to download the app. These amps do suffer from what all modeling amps suffer from, endless menus. From just a little poking around I was lost and then greeted with ear-blistering feedback. I must have pushed the wrong button. There are 8 of them, and each one made me feel dumber than the last. But that's why Mashall made these amp Bluetooth ready. Now we have a pretty little app to navigate instead of fidgeting
with all those buttons.





So I was somewhat limited to the preset to my review, and I am aware that the "presets always suck", but then there's the Marshall CODE. The preset are actually pretty good. They also span a good range. They aren't just: Metal, Nu-Metal, Grind Core, Heavy Metal, Metal-Metal.. and so on. Everything from cleans to crunch, and yes, even metal where offered up and surprisingly believable. Understand I come from the dark ages where modeling amps just gave you a range of eww to yuck. You desperately tried to clean up to tone enough to keep it from becoming mushy and falling out of the mix. But this amp would have no problem with that. It has plenty of presence, and it holds its bottom end quite well. The single most impressive thing, to me anyway, is the freaking cab simulator. I might as well hang up my gear review career (bahaha career... anyways) because I never saw the day I'd actually like a cab sim, but this one works. It's not just different colored blanket over the speaker. I don't know what wizard they have at Marshall casting these spells, but these thing made this tiny little amp sound like it came from my Marshall 1960 cab. Huge caveat: the amp most diffidently has an optimal listen position. Please don't think that you can fill a room with this amp like  you could with a 4x12, but listening from the right spot, you absolute get the feeling that you are playing through more than one speaker. Guys, I kid you not, after I played this amp I didn't know who I was any more. I had a full existential crisis. It got weird. Things that I believed were falling down all around me. Who was I? Why was I there? And then I remembered that I was guitarist and I was here to rock! On to the Katana




The BOSS Katana



Still a little shaken from playing the Marshall CODE I started on the BOSS Katana. For a hundred watts, this amp is on the small side. It would win in a bar fight against the Marshall 50 watt CODE, but it'd be beat up pretty good. (assuming the Mashall 100 watt 2x12 CODE doesn't show up... that guy... ptsh) The Katana rocks a 12" speaker and cute little kickstand. Even on the .5 watt mode this amp was plenty loud for the room. However, I didn't want to listen to an amp whisper at me, so I turned it up to the 50 watt setting and adjusted everything to my liking. Including the power mode selector, the Katana had a dozen knobs. My heart sank. I loved being presented with the Marshall's simple-six, but BOSS was smart and organized them in way that even made sense to me. In addition, I found the BOSS, predictably, more flexible (by hand) than the Marshall. changing things like effects on the fly were much simpler with the BOSS. However, the real magic in the amp is in the flexibility and maneuverability of the Tone Studio editor. It's basically like unlocking the cheat codes to a video game. There is so much more if you really want to crack into it.



The greatest strength of this amp is the Amp Type selector. There are only four modes (excluding the acoustic mode) but every one of them is usable. In fact, actually rather stellar. Each one sounds natural and clear. Unlike other amps that just heap mud on top of your tone as you travel gainy to gainier amp settings (looking at you line6). BOSS has done a very smart job of making each type distinct and nuanced. The Lead setting isn't Crunch but louder, The Brown setting isn't lead but... brown-er? Anyways, each setting is lovely. You can hear the years of experience in this amp. The Clean and Crunch setting borrow form Roland's Blues Cube, and the Brown setting is the little brother of the WAZA Craft amps. Not having any experience with the included software, I can't speak to its usability, however it looks like you have the flexibility to nail a huge range of tones. These are lovely little amps that seriously rocks. However, they do lack the mobile app interface. Something I, until recently, assumed they had (woops). Besides that huge, glaring misstep, this amp is a homerun. I was much more excited than I had any right to be for this amplifier, and I was not disappointed.


But this was a verses review...





Conclusion




I'd almost have to pro/con this one out. Marshall absolutely killed everything. BOSS put together something that was everything I didn't know I wanted. Marshall has a deeper set of parameters. The BOSS does everything very well, and has some features that the Marshall doesn't (line in/out). That is kind of unheard of in amp in this range. I think BOSS thought that people are still going to want to run effects into their amp and having that option helps a ton. That way you don't run all your outboard effect through that digital modification. That's smart. Marshall is basically a do it all box that could possible have software updates making it virtually limitless... kind of scary... in a good way.




So I played these amps back to back. I had no idea which was better when I was done. I didn't know which one I'd choose when I started writing this (full disclosure: I was leaning BOSS). But after having to write about the Marshall and really process all that information again, it is really close. Real talk, it would depend on the situation and your preference. For me? I'm going with the Marshall.



Why?

  • Super Flexible
  • Amazing Amp Sims
  • App integration w/Bluetooth
  • 5-At-Once Effects
p.s.


I know this thing is super long and thank you for reading this far, but let me know if you guys like the whole "verses" thing or if you like your review to be more standalone. The situation kinda presented its self in a head to head way, so that's what I wrote. Anywho... Thanks!